🔗 Share this article

Keir Starmer is facing backbench anger after ministers abandoned plans to provide employees immediate safeguards against unfair dismissal, a reversal violating the Labour manifesto.

MPs Voice Concerns

Parliamentarians such as a previous cabinet member who spearheaded the employment rights bill have voiced concerns about the concession announced by the government.

Ministers have axed the initiative to eliminate the two-year waiting requirement for workers to submit unfair firing complaints and allow them to do so starting immediately in a new job, in an attempt to pass the legislation through parliament.

Government Impasse

The bill was caught in a dispute involving peers and MPs concerning the first draft to give workers the protection immediately, including proposals to ban "exploitative" zero-hours contracts.

The administration now aims to introduce the right regarding wrongful termination after six months of service as an alternative, while other day-one rights to fatherhood time off and illness compensation are still due to move forward, becoming active in the second quarter of 2026.

Resistance and Disapproval

The elected official for the northeastern constituency described the move as a "utter breach of trust" and pledged to advocate for its cancellation.

"We cannot support that halfway measure."

"This constitutes flawed decision-making and I will campaign to overturn this compromise."

An additional parliamentarian voiced disappointment regarding insufficient discussion, remarking: "There has been absence of dialogue with the PLP. Peers shouldn't override over a manifesto commitment, so why have we capitulated??"

Extended Ramifications

Another representative remarked: "Businesses should not worry about immediate protections, while employees have much to lose from an employer who opposes immediate protections."

The previous work and pensions official asserted that the decision "undoubtedly constitutes a pledge violation."

Ministerial Explanation

The schools minister explained existed a "genuine possibility" the enactment of the labor reform proposal would have been delayed if the government had not made a U-turn over first-day rights against wrongful termination.

"There has been discussion concerning the matter about unjust firing and the time period with employers, trade unions and the administration, and subsequent to that dialogue understanding has been reached regarding the path ahead, that demonstrates progress."

The minister stressed that "This indicates the eligibility timeframe will decrease from two years to six months, and that runs alongside crucial immediate protections regarding health-related payments and about family time off."

"However the danger present without forward movement, those significant entitlements wouldn't come into force starting spring 2026."

When questioned about whether it represented an unfulfilled pledge, the secretary answered: "Throughout the campaign document, what we said was that we planned to cooperate with trade unions, with employers, with civil society, while discussing those protections we intended to implement."

"Therefore, two components exist to that, within the manifesto, the significant entitlements and the discussion process."